IConfiguration vs IOptions NET
Synchronous and Asynchronous in .NET Core
Model Binding and Validation in ASP.NET Core
ControllerBase vs Controller in ASP.NET Core
ConfigureServices and Configure methods
IHostedService interface in .NET Core
ASP.NET Core request processing
| Razor Pages vs MVC vs Minimal APIs in ASP.NET Core | REST principles and API Design | |
The Options Pattern in .NET Core |
The Options Pattern in .NET Core is a powerful way to manage configuration settings in a clean, type-safe, and scalable manner. It’s especially useful when dealing with grouped settings like connection strings, authentication parameters, or feature flags.
Instead of accessing configuration values directly using IConfiguration["Key"], the Options Pattern binds configuration sections to strongly typed classes and injects them using IOptions<T>.
public class JwtConfigSettings
{
public string Issuer { get; set; }
public string Audience { get; set; }
public bool ValidateExpiration { get; set; }
public string SignInKey { get; set; }
}
"JwtConfigSettings": {
"Issuer": "MyApp",
"Audience": "MyUsers",
"ValidateExpiration": true,
"SignInKey": "SuperSecretKey123"
}
builder.Services.Configure<JwtConfigSettings>(
builder.Configuration.GetSection("JwtConfigSettings"));
public class AuthService
{
private readonly JwtConfigSettings _settings;
public AuthService(IOptions<JwtConfigSettings> options)
{
_settings = options.Value;
}
public void PrintIssuer() => Console.WriteLine(_settings.Issuer);
}
IOptions<T> for static configuration.IOptionsSnapshot<T> for per-request scoped updates (e.g., in web apps).IOptionsMonitor<T> for real-time updates and change notifications.ValidateDataAnnotations() or custom logic.IConfiguration may be simpler.IOptions<T> with manual configuration access—it breaks consistency.IOptionsSnapshot<T> in singleton services—it won’t behave as expected.| Feature | Use It When... | Avoid It When... |
|---|---|---|
IOptions<T> |
Static config, injected once | You need frequent updates |
IOptionsSnapshot<T> |
Per-request scoped config | In singleton services |
IOptionsMonitor<T> |
Real-time config changes | You don’t need change tracking |
Direct IConfiguration |
One-off or simple values | You want type safety and structure |
Let’s explore the advanced usage of the Options Pattern in .NET Core, including validation, change tracking, and best practices for real-world scenarios.
You can validate configuration at startup using data annotations or custom logic.
public class EmailSettings
{
[Required]
public string SmtpServer { get; set; }
[Range(1, 65535)]
public int Port { get; set; }
}
Register with validation:
builder.Services
.AddOptions<EmailSettings>()
.Bind(builder.Configuration.GetSection("EmailSettings"))
.ValidateDataAnnotations()
.ValidateOnStart(); // optional: fail fast on startup
builder.Services
.AddOptions<EmailSettings>()
.Bind(builder.Configuration.GetSection("EmailSettings"))
.Validate(settings => settings.Port != 0, "Port must be non-zero");
Use IOptionsMonitor<T> when config values might change during runtime (e.g., from external sources like Azure App Configuration).
public class MyService
{
private readonly IOptionsMonitor<EmailSettings> _monitor;
public MyService(IOptionsMonitor<EmailSettings> monitor)
{
_monitor = monitor;
_monitor.OnChange(updated => Console.WriteLine($"New SMTP: {updated.SmtpServer}"));
}
public void SendEmail()
{
var settings = _monitor.CurrentValue;
// use settings
}
}
| Scenario | Use It? | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Grouped config values (e.g., SMTP) | ✅ | Clean structure and type safety |
| Frequently changing config | ✅ | Use IOptionsMonitor<T> for updates |
| Per-request scoped config | ✅ | Use IOptionsSnapshot<T> in web apps |
| One-off values (e.g., version string) | ❌ | Use IConfiguration directly |
| Deeply nested or dynamic config | ❌ | Consider direct access or custom binding |
IOptionsSnapshot<T> in singleton services—it’s scoped to requests.IOptions<T> with direct IConfiguration access—it breaks consistency.ValidateOnStart() in production to catch misconfigurations early. | Razor Pages vs MVC vs Minimal APIs in ASP.NET Core | REST principles and API Design | |